About Me

Name: Moonkeeper
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Where's the 2nd party?

If listening to political rhetoric, one can be convinced that there are two very polarized major parties constantly fighting over policy. Yet on major issues, the side favoring government control and more regulations always seems to eventually win. Viewing legislation on a small government vs. big government perspective instead of a republican vs. democrat perspective shows the same side always winning.

In 1993, NAFTA was passed by democrats, even though they are now supposedly against it. The republicans originally rejected the Patriot Act in the late 90s. Campaign Finance Reform was democrat-supported legislation in the late 90s, yet it was passed by a republican congress and signed by a republican president. The prescription drug entitlement program was also given to the country by a republican president and a republican house and senate. No true tax cuts have been passed since JFK (the effective rate under Reagan and Bush Jr. actually increased). Government spending adjusted for the CPI and population growth, has not decreased year-over-year under any of the recent administrations. This holds true even when separating military, domestic and discretionary spending. Obama’s plan for getting out of Iraq is now effectively the same as the republican plan. He has also increased troops in Afghanistan. Each side has passed and signed a bank bailout. Despite each party at different times having appointed a majority of Supreme Court justices, major decisions go in the same direction (see: Kelo vs. New London). Republicans complain of democrat socialism, yet on two separate occasions, have sent out “stimulus checks.”

Yet, despite the evidence, people continue to argue that their side is made up of the good guys while the other side is made up of the bad guys. People cheer for their political party the same way a sports fan cheers for the home team, blindly calling fans of the other team losers. Does no one realize that both sides are moving in the same direction?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

One and One's Rights

A logical society is based on the idea that government can only govern individuals. Only individuals exist. As much as we try to put ourselves into groups, those groups are only used as convenient methods to describe oneself. One might say "I am black," or "I am conservative." While the individual may identify with that group, actually belonging to the group is an abstract idea. A group does not exist except as a means of identifying a quantity of individuals. In reality, only individuals exist. Therefore, the only rights that can truly exist are individual rights.

In the public square, it is popular to put labels on certain ideas and call them rights. Listening to virtually any politician results in a discussion of a number of group rights. We may hear about women's rights, racial equality, worker's rights, gay rights etc... The discussion of rights in this matter can never lead to the preservation or (re)establishment of freedom. The rights of a woman do not exist because she is a woman. Those rights exist because she is an individual. The same can be said for every other group. In a free society, rights can only be given to individuals. Collective rights are artificial entitlements to certain individuals that happen to have a certain characterstic and an infringement of freedoms among those that don't have that characteristic.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »